{"id":1914,"date":"2025-02-09T18:19:28","date_gmt":"2025-02-09T18:19:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fnews06.org\/?p=1914"},"modified":"2025-02-09T18:19:28","modified_gmt":"2025-02-09T18:19:28","slug":"i-work-at-a-water-park-this-is-normal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fnews06.org\/?p=1914","title":{"rendered":"I work at a water park. This is normal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>An outraged TikTok user caught sight of an attractive woman wearing a one-piece bathing suit at a family waterpark. Because the woman in the suit had a bathing suit with a thong back, the TikTok user began using their mobile device to record a video of the attractive woman as she spoke to a man that users of the Chinese-created social media app believe was either her husband or boyfriend.<\/p>\n<p>The woman who filmed the video was named Kim Stram, and she was furious that the young woman would wear such a revealing bathing suit to a family-friendly waterpark. She turned to the Chinese website and app to ask people if she was right in assuming that the woman was wrong to wear her bathing suit like that. But instead of getting the reaction she hoped for. She was met with a mixed response as many people defended the woman in the bathing suit because she was in the water trying to enjoy herself at the public waterpark.<\/p>\n<p>Stram wrote as a caption of her now-viral TikTok video: \u201cIs this appropriate for a water park, or NOT?\u201d She also confirmed that she did not think the woman should be wearing the revealing bathing suit because it was not \u201cappropriate (because) there are kids all around her\u201d but that, nevertheless, the woman in the controversial one-piece bathing suit \u201clooks great\u201d in what she was wearing to the waterpark.<\/p>\n<p>Stram\u2019s video has accumulated more than four million views \u2013 mostly because people are eager to see the attractive woman in the revealing bathing suit. Commenters were on both sides of the fence, but the majority of viewers defended the woman in the pool because she was wearing a bathing suit just like everyone else was doing \u2013 she just looked attractive in it and was drawing eyes to herself.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cLol, cmon kids just want to swim. They don\u2019t care what you are wearing,\u201d one person wrote. \u201cAll they care about is being able to stay at the water park and not go home.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYep. She\u2019s old enough, and it\u2019s her choice,\u201d another agreed. \u201cWhy would kids care? Let her be her. Just worry about yourself.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI work at a water park. This is normal,\u201d someone else added.<\/p>\n<p>Others, however, agreed with Stram that the woman should not have been wearing such a revealing bathing suit because there were children present.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think it\u2019s inappropriate for kids to see,\u201d one person said. \u201cI would not want my daughter seeing another woman in a thong like that. Just my opinion.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think it\u2019s inappropriate because there are kids all around her,\u201d another agreed.<\/p>\n<p>At the end of the day, it is up to the woman wearing the bathing suit to decide what she feels comfortable in and how she wants to present herself to the world. If she is confident and happy with her body, then more power to her \u2013 she should rock that bathing suit with pride. If she feels like she needs to cover up more because she is not comfortable with how much skin is showing, then that is her prerogative as well. There is no right or wrong answer here \u2013 it is entirely up to the woman in the one-piece bathing suit.<\/p>\n<p>What do you think? Is it appropriate to wear a revealing bathing suit to a family waterpark?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An outraged TikTok user caught sight of an attractive woman wearing a one-piece bathing suit at a family waterpark. Because the woman in the suit had a bathing suit with a thong back, the TikTok user began using their mobile device to record a video of the attractive woman as she spoke to a man [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1915,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1914","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fnews06.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1914","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fnews06.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fnews06.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fnews06.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fnews06.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1914"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fnews06.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1914\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1916,"href":"https:\/\/fnews06.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1914\/revisions\/1916"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fnews06.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1915"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fnews06.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1914"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fnews06.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1914"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fnews06.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1914"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}